[epiar-devel] Fwd: [markettwp at yahoo.com: Re: epiar.net Contact Form Submission]

[Christopher Thielen]

Sounds good to me. Let's clean up paper cuts. I can probably write a
bunch of planet descriptions and we can do the release.

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:15:40AM -0700, Matthew Zweig wrote:
> I don't think that there was anything distinctive about the 0.5.0 revision.  Why not just make the current master 0.5.1?
> 
> I think that the current master is pretty stable right now.
> 
> It could probably use some more cleanup of course though.  For example, I don't think that the "Lorem Ipsum planet summaries" are appropriate.
> 
> I'm sure that there are some other paper cuts that we could fix.
> 
> ~Matt
> 
> On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:28 PM, Christopher Thielen wrote:
> 
> > Matt,
> > 
> > Should some of the recent changes be backported to 0.5.0? Remember we
> > want this to be a strong release.
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:18:38AM -0700, TWP Marketing wrote:
> >> Ok, emedded comments below
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Christopher Thielen <chris at epiar.net>
> >> To: TWP Marketing <markettwp at yahoo.com>
> >> Cc: Matthew Zweig <thezweig at gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 9:13 PM
> >> Subject: Fwd: [markettwp at yahoo.com: Re: epiar.net Contact Form Submission]
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Dave,
> >> 
> >> I've passed your input onto Matt, who has already fixed many of the issues. We'll have to figure out if we want to put them in 0.5.0 or wait for 0.6.0. Certainly the crash will be fixed in 0.5.0.
> >> 
> >> Please feel free to send your feedback on any aspect of the game - we appreciate it!
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >> 
> >> From: Matthew Zweig <thezweig at gmail.com>
> >>> 
> >>> Subject: Re: [markettwp at yahoo.com: Re: epiar.net Contact Form Submission]
> >>> 
> >>> Date: June 21, 2011 12:10:47 AM PDT
> >>> 
> >>> To: Matthew Zweig <thezweig at gmail.com>
> >>> 
> >>> Cc: Christopher Thielen <chris at epiar.net>
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 5a. The image selection scrolling list on the left of screen should be sorted by the subcategory ie, planets should display only planets on the scrolling image list.
> >>>> 
> >>> No Changes.  We don't have subcategories for these things; it's just a pipe from 'ls'.
> >>> 
> >>> Suggestion: add subdirectories to hold the different categories of images, and then use the pathname attribute;
> >>>  'ls ./Resources/Graphics/Planets'
> >>>  'ls ./Resources/Graphics/Ships'
> >>> etc.
> >>>   I'm assuming that ./Resources/Graphics is where the program reads this info, if I'm wrong, adjust as necessary to fit the actual pathname to the images.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 6b  The sort order of the images is alphabetic by name, which means that "planet2.png" is displayed AFTER "planet11.png".  This is probably an artifact of the database  engine or of C++. Minor point but can be a pain when there are many items on the list.
> >>>>> 
> >>> No Changes. This kind of number aware sort would be cool but wouldn't add much.  There's no significance to the names Planet11 or Planet2.  We could leave out the paths all together.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> I'm ok with this (#b6) since the end user will not see these lists, only developers. It's a minor point.
> >> 
> >> Dave
> > 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> epiar-devel mailing list
> >> epiar-devel at epiar.net
> >> http://epiar.net/mailman/listinfo/epiar-devel
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > epiar-devel mailing list
> > epiar-devel at epiar.net
> > http://epiar.net/mailman/listinfo/epiar-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> epiar-devel mailing list
> epiar-devel at epiar.net
> http://epiar.net/mailman/listinfo/epiar-devel